Archive for the ‘Other projects’ Category

Planet Pledge Pyramid

Friday, December 11th, 2009

A very quick shout out to Saul Albert at The People Speak, who has started aPlanet Pledge Pyramid:

a pyramid scheme to save the planet… culminating in a gonzo reality game-show called Who Wants to Be…? where the audience decides how to spend the money. Of course, they could decide to do anything with the cash, but it’s happening at the Copenhagen Climate Forum, and this time, we’re inviting an Internet audience of indeterminate size to join in, pledge and vote live on the outcome!

Go and take a look.

Council or community?

Monday, November 16th, 2009

In an excellent overview (Digital engagement governance – a dichotomy between hyperlocal or partnership managed), Michele Ide-Smith sets out the pros and cons of handling community engagement projects through councils and partnerships, or through more organic local community media approaches:

Council / partnership managed approach

Pro’s:

  • A level of moderation and facilitation control
  • Less reliance on volunteers, who are often transitory and hard to coordinate
  • Focus on specific issues relevant to public service providers
  • Council hosts system and data – reliable and secure
  • Potential for integration with other systems, workflow etc.

Con’s:

  • Top down = undemocratic
  • Resource intensive to moderate
  • Not as sustainable longer term when funding runs out
  • Lack of focus on community interests may disenfranchise the community
  • Liability and data protection issues
  • Technology less flexible and higher support costs

Community led/managed approach

Pro’s

  • Democratic and self-moderating
  • Sustainable model – owned by the community
  • Building community skills in digital media and citizen journalism
  • Public service providers have no liability
  • Low / no cost technology and flexibility to try a range of different tools

Con’s

  • Lack of control, public service providers not engaged due to fear of criticism
  • Reliance on a few motivated individuals, could be hijacked by one community group
  • Lack of motivation / interest from community in digital media
  • Lack of community access to internet and skills in digital media production
  • Unclear how to intervene if there are tensions or conflict arises
  • Reliance on continuing existence of providers of platforms / tools

GOP.com

Monday, October 19th, 2009

I’m having a wander around the new Republican social networking site, GOP.com. It doesn’t look like a huge advance on the Obama campaign site, although without registering you can’t see everything. A quick look at the Group and States page suggests that levels of activity are still pretty low – eight groups in total and sparse membership in state groups (CA, with 27 members, is the most popular).

It was interesting to see that they had a Code for America page – although I think it should more honestly be called “Code for the Party” since there is already a MySociety-type non-partisan organisation called Code for America.

We are the robots

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

The new Kraftwerk box set coincides with an equally cool, but less retro, robot launch. Sidekick Studios have placed the Vinspired Voicebox robot in the Houses of Parliament, and it is faithfully reproducing the comments that young people are leaving at its website.

The live stream should appear below, there is also a Flickr set of selected earlier messages.

Video clips at Ustream

The taint of politics

Monday, October 5th, 2009

There’s been a flutter of comment around the announcement that Tom Steinberg, Chief Exec and founder of MySociety, is going to be advising the Conservatives (on a personal basis) on Internet issues. Tom Watson, former Labour minister criticises the move on his blog, and says it’s incompatible with the non-partisan nature of MySociety. Tom sets out his reasons on his own blog.

I know Tom slightly from a long time ago, and I have to say he’s never expressed to me any party political opinions. His public opinions are centred around free information and free data, and what he implements through MySociety reflects those beliefs. Like many people, his beliefs are his starting point, and he wants others, politicians included, to agree with him.

If you start from that point, it must be both gratifying and tempting when the likely next Government comes and asks you to advise them. The negative reaction to Tom’s decision seems to be for three reasons:

  1. Tom is very personally identified with MySociety, as founder and Chief Exec. That means the independent and radical cachet of MySociety goes with him, whatever anyone says about ‘in a personal capacity’. Particularly if he remains as Chief Exec, it’s going to be hard to separate out MySociety from his personal work, unless MySociety finds other people to do conference speeches and media appearances on their behalf

  2. There are a lot of people, by no means only professional politicians, who start from a party-political mindset. Work for the ‘other side’ and you’ll be instantly under suspicion of adherence to all their completely mistaken beliefs. This is fire that comes from both sides, and the line that non-political organisations have to walk on political issues is a very fine one
  3. In British culture at the moment – sadly – being aligned to a political party taints you. It associates you with those nasty cunning politicians, and sharply reduces the credibility of whatever you say. As can be seen by the MMR case, where ‘independents’ were trusted over ‘the medical establishment’, this is hardly a positive thing for public debate, but that’s where we are at the moment.

In Tom, the Tories have snagged a smart and committed advisor on open government and open data issues. I hope that he keeps them honest amid the pressures for secrecy that power and the civil service will put on them. But I also hope that MySociety is mature enough to separate itself a little from its founder, and doesn’t suffer from the smear of dishonesty that political involvement brings these days.

MyConservatives.com debuts

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

The new interactive site MyConservatives.com launches today. Dominic Campbell has a full write-up of it at PDF. It seems like the first version prioritises fundraising and campaigning (on user-defined issues), rather than discussion.

An early test for them is whether they can get a critical mass of users (there are only 250k Tory party members, probably less, and the political branding will repel as well as attract). They also need to avoid the splintering that iCan saw into a million micro-campaigns.

Schools design a new Parliament

Saturday, June 27th, 2009

If you’re hanging around Westminster between 7 and 17 July, pop into Westminster Hall to check out what sounds like a fun exhibition. The Royal Institution of British Architects have run a competition for schools to design a new Houses of Parliament. The nine shortlisted entries will be on display in the oldest part of the Parliamentary estate.
(more…)

Reality scores from the rebound

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Direct democracy experiment MyFootballClub was featured in recent online movie Us Now. You’ll remember the MyFC website took over Ebbsfleet United (the former Gravesend and Northfleet) and promised its members all the experience of running a real football club, team selections, transfer listing players, and the rest.

According to a piece on the When Saturday Comes blog, the experiment is not doing so well. Apart from a decline in membership, which is having an effect on the club’s already shaky budget, many of the democracy elements of the operation have been junked. The website members no longer pick the team, and now have ceded some power over transfers to the management, which is appointed by the MyFC website owners.

When Saturday Comes opines:

you have to wonder what the future holds for MyFC if the power afforded to members keeps being eroded. With Daish regaining some control of transfer policy, and the headline grabbing – but ridiculous – concept of fans picking the team having long been consigned to the dustbin, there is little incentive to persuade new investors to part with £35 per year, especially as the club look set for another season at the wrong end of the table.

A site commenter makes the best point of all – that an operation like MyFootballClub, started on the Internet without a particular club in mind, was never going to create a common bond strong enough to keep people participating through the bad times:

If it had been a supporters’ trust that bought the club, then perhaps this could have all been avoided. By going from internet-concept first, and THEN casting about for a team after members had been brought onboard, the erosion of support has been swift but not unforeseeable–how is a “member” in California or Australia supposed to feel any sort of bond with this side? After clicking yes/no a few times, how likely would they be to stay engaged? In their world of YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, surely the same denizens couldn’t be expected to focus on a mere non-league football team in little old England for too long.

Warmer … colder … warmer

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

DEFRA have published the UK Climate Projections, which are based on mounds of data and show what the UK climate is likely to look like by the middle years of this century.

As web.gov goes, it’s a bit disappointing. The mounds of data are nowhere to be seen, and the maps available within a couple of clicks are limited to UK-wide or the (ludicrously large and unwieldy) UK administrative regions.

This is a major event for experts in climate change, but for the general public (the ones whose attitudes and actions need to change) there is no hint on the site of the main question: “What does it mean for me, here, now?”

They Want To Work For You Wiki

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

Here (via Dave Briggs) is a fascinating project: both an attempt to provide a crowdsourced election resource and (perhaps unintentionally) an experiment as to whether matters of serious political argument can ever be dealt with fairly and cost-effectively using a wiki model.

It’s They Want To Work For You Wiki – a wiki that will when complete provide information on every candidate for every constituency in the upcoming UK general election.

It will be interesting to see whether the wiki approach produces either disproportionately long articles on minor candidates (cf. articles about Battlestar Galactica characters on Wikipedia) or flaming edit wars (cf. anything about Israel on Wikipedia).