A longer post on the democratic implications of what we’ve seen in Europe in the past few weeks is in the works. In the meantime, here’s an extract from a speech given by Alexander Stubb, Finland’s Europe Minister, which touches on
In a blog post, Hugo Brady of the Centre for European Reform describes the current tensions between member state politicians and the EU institutions on immigration. National politicians need to be seen to be tough on it, EU politicians need to protect it (in the guise of freedom of movement, one of the main purposes of the EU).
Herman van Rompuy is not known as a charismatic politician but, if you have time to read it, he gave a very thoughtful speech yesterday at the College of Europe in Bruges.
In it, he talks about the role of the European Council (rather than the Eurozone ministers or the Parliament) as Europe’s nascent “economic government”, and the difficulty of creating co-ordinated foreign policy among 27 state actors with different histories and outlooks.
On economics and the eurozone, van Rompuy said:
The libertarian Freedom Association is holding a Tea Party at the Conservative Spring Conference in Brighton this weekend, modelled on the American anti-tax grassroots movement. If you are interested in going along, the event is open to the public.
Tomorrow, I’ll have time – I hope – to write something longer about the democratic implications of the Greek bailout, and any conditions that are imposed on Greece in consequence of its financial position and Euro membership.
As the anniversaries roll around, we’re constantly reminded how world-changing the years 1989-91 were, comparable with 1848 or 1789.
Today’s anniversary is of the release of Nelson Mandela. Some links for those who want to explore more, or bring back the memories:
- The BBC has an audio and video archive of its coverage of various occasions in Mandela’s life
Conservative Home has the highlights of David Cameron’s interview with the Express this morning.
One of the points Mr Cameron makes is that he will never allow the UK to join the Euro. He says:
“I was in the Treasury when we were in the Exchange Rate mechanism, and I said to myself: “Never again should we give up control of our domestic interest rates.” If I am Prime Minister and for as long as I would be Prime Minister, I would never take Britain into the euro, full stop, end of story.”
This is an odd statement, not because of its dogmatic certainty (he is talking to the Daily Express, after all) but because when Mr Cameron worked for Norman Lamont, the Chancellor did control domestic interest rates. Since interest-rate powers are now with the Bank of England, Prime Minister Cameron will not be able to control them.
The Brookings’ Institution’s Justin Vaïsse takes apart the Eurabia myth in this excellent short piece inForeign Policy. He points out the concept’s stylistic links to fear of “Eurocommunism” in the 50s and general anti-European and anti-internationalist sentiments on the American
I have been a bit surprised by the number of comments coming in on an old post of mine on the Kercher trial, which has just concluded in Perugia. I commented on British coverage of the trial when it kicked
Today is a day to remember – I’m serious. Here’s Dan Hannan, MEP, on his blog this morning: Britain is no longer a sovereign nation. At midnight last night, we ceased to be an independent state, bound by international treaties