As you might imagine, one of the results of this is that Labour and the Greens have been going at each other hammer and tongs, as left-aligned Brighton Politics Blogger bemoans.
They [Labour and Green campaigners in central Brighton] must put aside their tribal differences and accept that there must be a Green tactical vote in Brighton Pavilion and Labour votes in Brighton Kemptown and in Hove. Defeating the Tories is most important.
I like the “must” – for all the world as though logic had anything to do with political campaigning.
There are many frustrated anti-Conservatives (“progressives” in their own term) who are saying the same thing at the moment. In fact, with saturation coverage of Cameron, Clegg, Balls, and Blair, all pitching in on whether tactical voting is or isn’t OK, inattentive voters might be forgiven for thinking that the little matter of the economic crisis had been solved to everyone’s satisfaction.
The problem in Brighton Pavilion, and in some other constituencies, is the problem of First Past the Post writ small: if your primary concern is to prevent a particular party winning, you have to take a punt on how your fellow voters are going to act, or see your vote go to waste. It is perfectly possible that the vote on Thursday will split 31/30/30 between Conservative, Labour and Green, and that Charlotte Vere, the Conservative candidate, will become the MP of the anarchist bookshop on London Road, the tattoo parlours on North Road, and thirty thousand or so very disillusioned voters.
Definitely something to put Brighton’s voters off their muesli.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Election 2010: Bohemian Brighton may gift Greens their tipping point (guardian.co.uk)
- Will Brighton give Lucas the green light? (guardian.co.uk)
- Volatile general election campaign will blow the old order apart (guardian.co.uk)